The Pricing Pattern That Makes Homeowners Overpay — and How to Check for It
Front-loading moves money forward, not away. Check the value of every stage: at first fix, roughly 50% paid against 50% built is the sanity test.
- 4.8★ Google · 16 reviews
- £500 per week if we finish late
- £17m insurance cover · £5m public liability
- 12-month warranty on second-fix fittings · HomePro registered
- £550 survey credited in full
Front-loading does not make a job more expensive — it makes it more dangerous, because the money moves forward while the work does not. The check takes ten minutes: ask for the value of every stage, then compare cumulative money against cumulative work. At first fix, roughly 50% paid against 50% built is the sanity test. The estimator gives you a stage-by-stage breakdown to compare against, and our extensions and loft conversion pages set out how the stages actually run.
Most homeowners who overpay their builder never work out how it happened. The money did not vanish. It moved forward — the structural stages were priced heavy, and part of the finishes cost was quietly folded inside them.
The mechanism
Every domestic build is paid in stages, because no homeowner should hand over the whole sum on day one and no builder can fund a job to completion out of their own pocket. That much is uncontroversial. The question is what each stage is worth.
A well-priced schedule attaches money to value. Demolition and groundworks carry the cost of demolition and groundworks. Second fix carries the cost of second fix. As the job progresses, the money you have paid and the work standing in front of you rise together, roughly in step.
A front-loaded schedule breaks that link. The early stages — where the work is heavy, dirty and impressive — are priced above their real cost. The later stages, where the work is fiddly, slow and where most of the complaints live, are priced below. The total is unchanged. Nothing has been added. Compare two quotes on the bottom line and you will not see it.
What you feel instead is this: sometime around second fix, you have paid eighty per cent of the money for sixty per cent of a house.
Why that hurts, in three specific ways
Your money gets ahead of the build. If anything goes wrong — the contractor overreaches on another job, a supplier fails, a company folds — you are exposed for the gap between what you have paid and what exists on site. That gap is the entire risk, and front-loading is what opens it.
You lose the only leverage you had. The last fifteen per cent of a job is the hardest to finish: snagging, making good, the door that binds, the socket in the wrong place, the tile cut nobody is happy with. The thing that gets a builder back to do it is money still attached to the job. Once that money is gone, all that remains is goodwill — and goodwill has a bad record against a contractor who has already moved a team onto the next site.
It hides the real cost of the finishes. If part of the finishes budget was consumed inside the structural stages, then the finishes stage no longer holds enough to pay for what you specified. The conversation this produces is familiar: “that tile has gone up”, “that was never in the price”, “we can do it, but there’ll be an extra”. Sometimes those are honest. Sometimes they are the arithmetic arriving.
The check, which takes ten minutes
Ask for the value of every stage, as a number and as a percentage of the contract sum. Any contractor who has priced the job properly can produce this in a few minutes, because they built the price that way. A contractor who cannot, or who sends back a schedule with round numbers that do not reconcile to the total, has told you something useful.
Then read it against the build:
| Point in the job | Work standing in front of you | Money reasonably paid |
|---|---|---|
| Enabling, strip-out, scaffold | Site set up, nothing built | ~5–10% |
| Substructure complete | Foundations in and inspected | ~20% |
| Superstructure and roof on | Building watertight | ~40% |
| First fix complete, before plaster | Structure, services, insulation, fire-stopping in | ~50% |
| Plaster and screed complete | Rooms readable, surfaces flat | ~65% |
| Second fix and joinery | Kitchen, bathrooms, doors, sanitaryware | ~85% |
| Practical completion | Everything but the snag list | ~95% |
| End of defects period | Snags closed | 100% |
These are proportions, not rules, and a job with a heavy structural component — an underpinned basement, a deep foundation on shrinkable clay — will legitimately sit further left. The point is not to police a percentage. It is that you should be able to ask why any stage is where it is, and get a specific answer. “Because the steels and the glazing are both ordered and paid for by then” is a specific answer. “That’s how we always do it” is not.
Five things worth looking for
A large deposit before anything is on site. Money against named materials genuinely ordered is reasonable — steels fabricated to your engineer’s drawing, windows in production, a kitchen released to the factory. Ask to see the order. A round percentage of the contract sum with nothing behind it is not a deposit.
Stages defined by date rather than by work. “Payment due 1st of each month” pays for time. “Payment due on completion of the damp-proof course and oversite” pays for work. Only the second gives you anything to inspect before releasing money.
“On commencement of” instead of “on completion of”. One word, and it moves an entire stage payment forward by however long that stage takes. It is worth reading every line of a schedule specifically for this.
Stage values that do not sum to the total. More common than it should be, and always worth a question.
No retention. Retention is a small percentage — commonly five per cent — held from each payment, with half released at practical completion and the balance at the end of the defects period, usually twelve months. It exists so money is still attached to the job when the snag list appears. It is standard, and a contractor who will accept no retention at all is worth asking why.
The part nobody tells homeowners
Here is the thing that changes how you should read all of the above. As a residential occupier, you do not have the statutory payment protections a commercial client has.
Section 106 of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 excludes construction contracts with a residential occupier from Part II of that Act. A property developer gets a statutory payment regime and an automatic right to adjudication — a fast, binding dispute process. You do not. Those rights only exist for you if your contract puts them there.
To be plain about our own position: this is not an escrow, and no domestic builder is holding your money in a protected account — holding client money in the UK is a regulated activity and it is not something a construction company does. A payment schedule tells you when to pay. It is not a protection mechanism, and anyone presenting it as one is overselling it.
Which means the contract is where your protection lives, or it does not exist. Read the payment clause before the specification. It is duller and it matters more.
How we structure it, and why
Every stage on our schedules is priced for its own value and is triggered by completed work, not by a date. Where money is required against materials, the order sits behind it and you can see it. The stage names line up with the points a building control inspector attends, which is convenient for one honest reason: those are moments when somebody independent is already looking at the work.
That is a description of a method, not a promise about outcomes. What it buys you is simple — your money should never get meaningfully ahead of the build, and there should always be enough left at the end to make finishing the job worth someone’s while.
If you want to see the shape before you talk to anyone, our lesson on comparing two quotes for the same job covers the other half of this: what is actually inside the number.
The takeaway
Before you sign, look at the payment schedule, not just the total. Ask for the value of every stage. If the structure is priced heavy and the finishes look light, ask why — and remember that as a residential occupier, the contract is the only payment protection you have.
Get an Itemised Estimate
Or call us on 020 8050 8968. We work across Fulham, Chelsea, Battersea, Kensington, Hammersmith and the surrounding boroughs.
Straight answers
The home you actually want, finished on the date in the contract — and you watch every day of it happen from your phone.
You answer 3 questions. We do the drawings, planning, party wall, trades and snagging.
- 10% to mobilise, then weekly against work already done — with 5% held past handover: 2.5% released at practical completion and 2.5% at the end of the 12-month defects period
- £550 survey fee credited in full against your contract
- Every variation priced and signed before a penny is spent
No email needed to see your range. Quotes hold for 21 days, then materials re-price.
We are not the cheapest. If price is the only factor, we may not be the right fit — and that is fine.
Keep reading
- Check Your Water Pressure Before You Renovate — Not After the TilingPressure and flow are different numbers and only one of them fills a bath. Measure both at the highest, furthest outlet before the design is fixed.
- Electric vs Water Underfloor Heating: The Honest Answer for a KitchenElectric is cheap to fit and expensive to run, so people stop using it. Wet suits the 55°C standard the regulations now require. Sometimes a radiator wins.
- Cracks Above Windows and Doors: The Lintel, and the Wall It Sits OnA diagonal crack out of a window corner is rarely the plaster. Check two things: 150mm of lintel bearing each end, and masonry strong enough to carry it.
- Why Walls Get Damp: The Damp-Proof Course and the Weep HolesDamp is rarely bad luck. Two numbers keep a wall dry: the DPC sits 150mm above outside ground, and weep holes appear every 900mm. Check both from the garden.